mirror of
https://github.com/boxpositron/absolute-dotfiles.git
synced 2026-10-24 08:23:19 +00:00
David Ibia
ea570af409
- Move the vendored skills from .config/opencode/skills to .config/omo/skills, with provenance and local changes in its README - Rewrite Impeccable's script paths to ~/.omo/agent/skills/impeccable so its detector and live-server verbs resolve under omo - frontend-workflow hands screenshots to a visual-engineering task instead of opencode run - Move the notes commands and /impeccable to .config/omo/prompts as omo prompt templates; setup-mcp stays behind because it writes opencode.json - Archive DEVELOPMENT-WORKFLOW.md and UI-WORKFLOW.md under .config/omo/archive; nothing loads them - link-ai-configs.sh links the skills into omo and Claude Code only and stops linking OpenCode's config, TUI, plugins and workflow docs - setup-mac.sh and Brewfile.apps stop installing OpenCode; README and .withcontextconfig.jsonc follow the new layout ~/.config/opencode/AGENTS.md stays linked: omo's rules engine reads it before ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md and stops at the first hit, so it carries the shared preferences and keeps OMC's instructions out of omo.
2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
Copy Editing Checklist
Use this checklist alongside the Seven Sweeps Framework (see SKILL.md) as a final QA pass before delivering edited copy.
Before You Start
- Understand the goal of this copy
- Know the target audience
- Identify the desired action
- Read through once without editing
Clarity (Sweep 1)
- Every sentence is immediately understandable
- No jargon without explanation
- Pronouns have clear references
- No sentences trying to do too much
Voice & Tone (Sweep 2)
- Consistent formality level throughout
- Brand personality maintained
- No jarring shifts in mood
- Reads well aloud
So What (Sweep 3)
- Every feature connects to a benefit
- Claims answer "why should I care?"
- Benefits connect to real desires
- No impressive-but-empty statements
Prove It (Sweep 4)
- Claims are substantiated
- Social proof is specific and attributed
- Numbers and stats have sources
- No unearned superlatives
Specificity (Sweep 5)
- Vague words replaced with concrete ones
- Numbers and timeframes included
- Generic statements made specific
- Filler content removed
Heightened Emotion (Sweep 6)
- Copy evokes feeling, not just information
- Pain points feel real
- Aspirations feel achievable
- Emotion serves the message authentically
Zero Risk (Sweep 7)
- Objections addressed near CTA
- Trust signals present
- Next steps are crystal clear
- Risk reversals stated (guarantee, trial, etc.)
AI Tells
- No "it's not X, it's Y" or "not because X, because Y" reveals
- No "no X, no Y, no Z" negation lists
- No sentences that trail restating comma clauses after the main claim (a clause adding a new fact is fine)
- No self-answered questions or colon reveals (FAQ questions and a reader's own question are fine)
- No stock openers or phrases ("In today's...", "Whether you're...", "Say goodbye to...")
- No em dashes in headlines, subheads, CTAs, ads, social posts, or subject lines; 1–2 per page max in long copy
- At most one fragment and one list of three per section (CTA microcopy and real three-feature lists don't count)
- Every vague adjective replaced with the fact it stood for
Final Checks
- No typos or grammatical errors
- Consistent formatting
- Links work (if applicable)
- Core message preserved through all edits